Home Tags Ian McMillan

Tag: Ian McMillan

Review| The Letters Page Vol.2 published by Book Ex Machina

0

To pick up a book, writes Ioanna Mavrou, is ‘as if stepping out of the world for a beat and taking a much needed breath.’ Mavrou runs the independent publishers Book Ex Machina, responsible for the exquisite collection of epistolary reflections: The Letters Page Vol. 2. Edited by author Jon McGregor (If Nobody Speaks Of Remarkable Things), the volume features twelve excellent contemporary writers. Each writer gives us their letter on the theme of ‘copies’.

Mavrou, an author in her own right, writes to Dear Reader: ‘I sit here, outside the world for a beat, writing a letter to a complete stranger’. It’s a beautiful, engaging start to the volume, and invites us to consider the tradition of letter-writing. For whom are these published letters really written? Each letter, of course, only being a copy of that writer’s world: a copy relayed to us through the slippery tools of words. For a beat, or a breath, the reader joins that world.

As Mavrou writes ‘it’s still March… And the fig tree outside the house just sprouted new leaves and we are thinking a lot about copies… Almost everything written comes to us via the act of making copies.’ She references The Epic of Gilgamesh written on clay tablets, and how technology has radicalised the format, if not the concept, of copies: digital e-books and MP3s in music. Now we have copies that both transcend time and no longer tangibly exist.

Mavrou takes us yet deeper still on the theme: ‘Human life itself is copies’, she writes. ‘Copies are in your cells, in your DNA.’ I was reminded of how a theory of epigenetics suggests music, and presumably writing, may follow the code of your cells. Finally, she writes in a (very) short story: ‘if you make enough copies of worlds, a copy of a copy of a copy enough times, maybe you’ll make it all the way home.’ A thought-provoking beginning, on solipsistic ontology.

In Joe Dunthorne’s letter, the writer is imprisoned by ‘well-dressed gentlemen’ but ‘the slender trees lend the ten-metre fence serene resplendence.’ They have helped him see ‘the less speech the better’. Later, we are informed that the letter is a univocal homage to Georges Perec, using only words with the letter ‘e’. ‘By constraining language,’ he writes, ‘the jailers constrain the prisoner’s ability to understand the world and to imagine other, better worlds.’

Kit Caless takes us to the world(s) of social media in ‘Who Knows The Origin Of Anything?’ He records a correspondence sent via Instagram Messenger: from ‘the guy who runs the Wetherspoon’s Carpets Tumblr’, to somebody who has set up a copycat Instagram account. It’s Vice-like humorous, tragic, and vaguely existential. Caless’ passive-aggressive tone is clever and classically British: ‘You seem to have gained a lot of followers… Almost as many as me.’

Nicole Flattery writes of the two families she was ‘farmed out to’ growing up, as both her mother and father worked. She adopts their mannerisms: ‘it’s rare to find a teenage girl with a fixed, definable personality. Most just plagiarise from whatever is available to them.’ The voice is wry and poignant, with an ache of humour. Flattery’s plagiarism leads her to study drama, followed by film, where she discovers homage: ‘it didn’t feel nasty or cheap. It felt like a secret.’

‘We’re All Plagiarists Of Each Other’ is poet Andrew McMillan’s letter, addressed to editor Jon McGregor, on his relationship with his father (poet Ian McMillan). McMillan, author of the universally lauded Physical, is understandably cagey: ‘other industries seem fine with inheritance of interest… Only in writing does it seem that people have a real issue with it.’ Yet McMillan surmises that all DNA is a plagiarism of our parents: ‘our great tragedy/triumph.’

In fact, he concludes: ‘you magpie from the world to build your own way of looking at it.’ Here, we link back to Mavrou and Dunthorne’s examination of writing creating copies of worlds.

Writing from New York, Chimene Suleyman begins her letter: ‘I don’t know where home is.’ But her Turkish mother is from Nicosia, Cyprus, where Book Ex Machina itself is based. ‘Here, you may see what war looks like, frozen in time.’ Divided between the Greeks and Turks, two young men share magazines of naked girls, and are joined: ‘simply, they are boys.’ Suleyman is a deep, evocative writer, although her human ‘purpose’ of boys is not sexually diverse.

Darren Chetty provides an illuminating take on hip-hop, education and originality. ‘It can be more difficult and rewarding to produce something that combines existing work into something new,’ he writes. Educator Pie Corbett is invoked next to hip-hop legends MC Grandmaster Caz and Mos Def in a powerful dissection of creativity: ‘Good rappers listen to rappers. Good writers read. You don’t develop a sense of ‘self’ in isolation from others.’

The standout letter in this collection is bittersweet, heartbreaking and hilarious. Rowena Macdonald writes about a real letter she finds in an old cookery book, dated 5th June 1982. ‘A letter from Jason to Kim… Kim is more alluring than the ‘young lady’ who keeps calling [Jason] up and ‘getting too close.’ Kim, though, has written a recipe for a pavlova on the back of Jason’s letter and casually used it as a bookmark.’ The reprint of Jason’s letter is full of pathos.

Sarah Dale addresses her letter to ‘anyone who has suffered from a urinary tract infection.’ Writing from a cycling holiday in Ėvian-les-Bains, Dale is in agony from acute cystitis. She discovers that in 1789, ‘Count Jean-Charles de Laizer came here to take the waters for his kidney stones… I drink another glass-full and wonder whether the women with him are silently in ‘maladie’ sans antibiotics.’ Dale’s writing is funny and refreshing (excuse the pun).

The Letters Page Vol. 2 achieves particular emotional truth in Jonathan Ellis’ ‘I’m Not Sure Who This Is Addressed To’. He recounts his Dad’s sudden death in his sleep, although immediately invokes epistemological doubt: ‘I don’t really know if it was sudden or in his sleep.’ All that is true, is that his Dad has died. Ellis captures the sense of displacement after a parent’s death. His description of his father’s last ‘letters’, written on yellow post-it notes, brought tears.

Matthew Welton’s ‘Five Pieces of 250 Words: A Bibliography’ is big and entrancing. The postmodern themes of ontology – in worlds, writing and copies – are bold in the text. Musicians and formats are referenced throughout: Big Bill Broonzy, Pete Seeger, Bob Dylan, Muddy Waters, ‘footage’, ‘album’, ‘record’, ‘download’, ‘DVD’. ‘As I write this,’ he says, in a recurrent motif of temporality, ‘the breeze… Is ruffling the pencil sharpenings on my desk.’

Finally, the last letter in the collection is by Jon McGregor himself. And it is the only letter that replies to one of the other letters: answering Andrew McMillan. ‘“I don’t mind talking my relationship with my dad,” you said; “what’s yours?”’ writes McGregor. ‘Well. It’s funny you should ask.’ He recounts how his father was a vicar – ‘my work revolves around words; his, The Word’ – but he ‘never wanted to follow in his footsteps’. Yet he looks and sounds like him.

McGregor lulls us – both Andrew and we, his public readers – into a false sense of security, as he writes about his father in the present tense: ‘we have both ended up in a role…’ This intensifies the impact of his father’s death, when revealed. ‘He died nearly two years ago… It turns out that the human brain – or this human brain, at least – takes quite a while to comprehend what ‘gone’ really means.’ There is a tart sense of anger at the unfairness of loss.

Overall, The Letters Page Vol. 2 is an immaculately presented and edited book. Each world of its letters gives us that much needed breath, that Mavrou cites in the beginning. An oxygen not of the body, but of truth. The writers might give us worded copies of their worlds, but they are clad in electric clarity; commensurate to their talent. By diving into these letters, we can step outside of our fake news, social media and advertising for a beat, and find a gamut of life.

by Patrick Cash


The Letters Page Vol. 2, edited by Jon McGregor, Book Ex Machina, September 2017

An interview with Ian McMillian

0
Photo by Jon Parker Lee

In this interview with Ian McMillan, The London Magazines Editor, Steven O’Brien, and Production Manager, Rachel Chanter, discuss Ian McMillan’s most recent collection of selected poems, To Fold the Evening Star.

SO’B: I was just reading an old, friendly poem in To Fold the Evening Star, one I haven’t read for ages – ‘It’s Only a Novelty Coronation Street Alarm Clock’. How did you decide which poems to select?

IM: Well there were some newer ones that hadn’t been published anywhere, and then there were the three Smith|Doorstop pamphlets which I put in as they were. After writing lots of other kinds of things for a few years, lyrics, librettos and non-fiction, suddenly I had a rush of writing poems, but those three pamphlets I kept.

Going back and looking at stuff from 1994, things that maybe didn’t seem to work as well I didn’t include, but most of it I kept. I was just amazed about how much there was. When I got the proof and it was 200 odd pages! Goodness me.

That’s amazing, you’re very prolific!

Well I am really but I didn’t realise I was that prolific! Thing is, I’m not a great archiver or keeper of things. I’m always more interested in the thing I’m writing today rather than what I’ll write tomorrow. When I look back at all these poems I just think, yes I have written a lot, and I’m certainly interested in them, but I’m always more interested in the thing I’m going to do next. So, it’s a pleasant surprise when you find a poem and think god, I’d forgotten about that one!

What’s it like to look at back at the ‘archived self’?

It’s just like when you get old photographs out the biscuit tin and you think, who’s that little lad? Who is that, that dark haired young lad, that fella right on the edge of the picture? Sometimes I read poems that I’ve written and I wonder what I was thinking about when I wrote that. Because I’ve been around for so long, this is the second book of selected poems that I’ve had. The first one came out in the late eighties, so that’s even stranger, looking back all those years. But you find these poems and you think oh, look at these old friends, look at these acquaintances… who are these strangers? It’s a fascinating process – it could make you nostalgic, I try not to let that happen. I try to make it remind me that I can still carry on writing poems. I suppose it’s like when you put a piece of wood and put it under a piano to stop it wobbling – it’s something that stops you thinking ‘well I’ve never written any poems before’, instead it reminds you that you actually have written quite a few, and I can carry on and write some more.

How do you feel about being referred to as the ‘John Peel‘ of poetry?

That’s an ancient thing that Alec Finlay said about me many years ago – partly because John Peel likes picking up new bands and new music – with poetry I get very excited by new voices, poetry by people I’ve not read before, by people who show promise. This is partly because people send me poems, partly because I’m always reading poems. I feel like we’re in a good time for poetry at the moment, lots of people are writing poems and I just still get excited finding new voices, so that’s the John Peel of poetry, really. Also I wear shapeless cardigans like he used to.

Photo by Ruth Bourne
Photo by Ruth Bourne

You said we’re in a good time for poetry at the moment. Can you comment on how and why that is so?

I think the profile [of contemporary poetry] is high at  the moment and it’s partly due – I’m not being flattering – to magazines like The London Magazine that have been around for a long time. It’s also to do with the fact that creative writing is being taught at universities. Now that’s increasing – it’s a bit like with music and art colleges – writers are appearing. They’ve been taught for three years, and now they’re setting up magazines and readings, doing events. Then there’s National Poetry Day… poetry just seems to be part of the nation’s cultural toolbox. I mean, it always was but when I look back to when I first started in the mid 70s, there were magazines around but there’s a lot more around now, so I think poetry is in a good place. There’s more people reading it, more people writing it, it seems to have a higher profile than it has for a while.

There’s all kinds of reasons for this, things like the T. S. Eliot Prize doing well, the Forward Prizes, all these big prizes. Carol Ann Duffy is also doing a great job as poet laureate, as Andrew Motion did before her – they upped the profile a bit. So it’s becoming like an ordinary thing to do, in a good way, it can take its place alongside theatre, film and music as the things people look at when they’re thinking of culture.

And you yourself have embraced a public role as a very generous ‘promotive’ poet. What can you say about that?

Well I’ve always enjoyed reading other people’s work, and there was a young writer, when I first started, that I was praised by, called Pete Morgan. I used to go along and see him – I can’t believe I did it – he used to live in York and I used to go over to his house, I just knocked at his door and went in! I realise now what an imposition that was. He was kind. He’d say ‘come in and have a cup of tea, let’s have a look at these poems’, and we’d talk about them.

 I just think that, if you can’t encourage people, then don’t bother. If someone sends me a book to review and I don’t like it, I send it back and say, look, get someone else to review it. I think for me there’s always been this split between the avant-garde and the populist, and I’ve always embraced the avant-garde. I love reading strange and weird stuff, I love reading J. H. Prynne, but on the other hand, I enjoy standing up and performing, making people laugh and making them think that this can be an inclusive thing. I’ve always tried to be generous and not exclude anybody, because I know how bad it is to be excluded, when people take no notice of your work.

I think for me the dilemma is always then, where do you find the time to read it all? You must find that.

All the books, all the magazines, all the poems that people give you – if you’re going to give them all the right amount of attention you should, then how on earth do you do it? I mean, today is an unusual day, that the postman didn’t bring any books of poetry or magazines, but I know tomorrow I’ll just get twice as many. So that’s the thing, to be generous – and I like to be generous – there’s this dilemma of when, where do you find the time to read it all?

We also wanted to ask – you’re known particularly as a Yorkshire poet. How you step out of the role as regional poet?

Well I think the more local you can be, the more universal you become. I always quote Roy Fisher, who stated in one of his poems, ‘Birmingham Is What I think with’. I like the idea that Barnsley is what I think with. I can still think universally though. If you think of someone like Tony Harrison who thinks with Leeds – you can think as locally as you can, and still be universal.

I was thinking about what Andy Croft said, that you go to an event and say: ‘We’ve got some local beer!’ and then everyone will cheer, then you say ‘We’ve got some local cheese!’ and everyone says go ‘Oh great!’ Then, you say ‘We’ve got some local poets!’ and people sigh. So somehow, the local poets are left out. But really, local poets can be as good as the perceived national poets.

Have poetry awards become an important part of the life and culture of poetry?

I think it has in the last forty years – there’s been an explosion in the numbers of poetry competitions. The reason I like poetry prizes, is that they make the poems stand alone on their own two feet. If you take a poem along to a workshop then you know you can sit around and talk about the poems. If someone sends a group of poems to The London Magazine, they know you’ll respond. But, with a poetry competition, you know you’ve got to write the best poem you can because you want it to win some money – you want it to capture the attention of the judges. I think they’re great for poetry. They make people sit down and write good poems.

Do you have any recommendations of new voices, new poets or collections that you really think have stood out?

There’s someone I’ve just read, Nia Davies from Hafan Press’s Boiled String Chapbook series. Her pamphlet I think is remarkable. It’s called ‘Long Words’ and she’s taken long words from other languages and used the word as the basis for a poem. For example, her first poem in the book is called ‘The Hatch a Bullet Flies out of when Exiting a Tunnel’ which is a translation of one single Estonian word. So she’s taken these words from the Estonian language, from Croatian, from Hungarian and made fantastic poems out of them. She’s a real find, as far as I’m concerned.

There was someone else I was getting excited about… Sam Quill. In the PN Review, he had 14 sonnets that are quite remarkable. He lives in South London and apparently these sonnets were his first in print which is exciting.

I’m always getting sent stuff and getting excited, which is good because it proves there’s plenty of exciting things happening.

And finally, could you say a few words about our upcoming Poetry Prize 2016?

Well, the poetry competition is a level playing field, whatever you send in will be on the same level as everyone else’s. If people don’t know who you are that doesn’t matter.

 

By Abi Lofthouse


unspecifiedIan McMillan is poet-in-residence for The Academy of Urbanism and Barnsley FC. He presents The Verb every week on BBC R3 and he’s a regular on Coast, BBC Breakfast, Countryfile, Pick of the Week and Last Word. He’s been a castaway on Desert Island Discs. Previously he was resident poet for English National Opera, Yorkshire TV’s Investigative Poet and Humberside Police’s Beat Poet. His rip-roaring poetry shows are legendary. Cats make him sneeze.

To Fold the Evening Star, Ian McMillan, Carcanet Press, 2016, £9.99